Thursday, Mar 28th

Last update04:55:26 AM GMT

Font Size

Screen

Profile

Layout

Direction

Menu Style

Cpanel

What’s in A Punjabi Name: A Lots of Vote in Delhi

  • PDF

By Sidharth Mishra

It’s said that politics is a great leveler. Last Sunday Atishi Marlena, the Aam Aadmi Party candidate from the East Delhi Lok Sabha seat held an unusual press conference to clarify her religion. She said that she was a Hindu Punjabi belonging to the Kshatriya community. Atishi, born to Marxist Leninist parents, who gave a surname extracted from the names of their ideological icons Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin, pushing her caste identity is an indication that politics in India is a way bit different from what Marx, Lenin and their ideological heirs pitched for.

For instance, 1100 kilometers away at Begusarai in Bihar, where the country’s best-known Marxist Kanhaiya Kumar is in fray as Communist Party of India (CPI) candidate, the electoral calculations are all based on which side the voters of Bhumihar caste go. Kanhaiya, all through his campaign, despite swearing by the ideology of classless society has made no overt attempt to disown his caste identity.
 
Coming back to the national Capital, Marlena is fast turning from being a ‘child of revolution’ into a Punjabi-Kshatriya, a combination heard for the first time in the 25 years that one has covered polls in this country, because her voters could careless for her ideology and seek more about her community.
 
She pitching herself as a Punjabi-Rajput, because her mentor Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia is a Kshatriya and the votes of his community especially in the Patparganj and neigbouring assembly segments are in good numbers. Not to forget that former cricketer Chetan Chauhan had contested from this seat in 2009 as BJP candidate and polled decent amount of votes, which had large chunks of his community Rajput ballots.
 
What, however, took Marlena’s goat is the whisper campaign that she was Jew. One may wonder why being a Jew could be such a problem as India is not driven by Nazi ideology founded on anti-Semitism that is hatred for the Jew community. Her problem is that East Delhi Lok Sabha seat has large population of the Muslims, who may not prefer a Jew over a Hindu candidate. Jewish resistance to spread of Islam is s after all part of Islamic history.
 
Thus, the necessity to clarify not only that she is not a Jew but also assert that she was a Punjabi and that too a Rajput. She is alluding to Punjabi antecedents because the East Delhi Lok Sabha seat has 14.20 percent votes of the community, next only to New Delhi which has Punjabi presence of 16.5 percent.  The Jew buzz hurt her because the Muslims too are present on East Delhi seat in the almost equal number.
 
Before the advent of Sheila Dikshit on the political scene of Delhi, East Delhi Lok Sabha constituency always remained a ‘Punjabi Refugee Seat’ with former Delhi Congress strongman HKL Bhagat winning the seat in 1971, 1980, 1984, and 1989. In 1977, he had lost to another Punjabi refugee Kishor Lal of the Janata Party.
 
BJP had won the seat in 1967 (as Bharatiya Jana Sangh) and in 1991 again with Punjabi refugee candidates, Hardayal Devgun and Baikunthlal Sharma Prem respectively. It was only in 1997 bypolls that Punjabis lost and that too to a Purvanchali, Lal Bihari Tiwari of the BJP, who defeated Ashok Walia of the Congress. Walia lost largely because Bhagat had contested that election as a rebel and polled votes almost equal to Walia.
 
Though in 1998, Sheila Dikshit contested and lost narrowly to Tiwari, in 1999 Congress went back to fielding a Punjabi – HKL Kapur, who lost to Tiwari but polled 4.38 lakh votes. At the height of Dikshit’s popularity as Chief Minister, her son Sandeep Dikshit won the seat in 2004 and 2009 and lost in 2014.
 
This time around all the three candidates in the fray – Gautam Gambhir of the BJP, Atishi Marlena of the AAP and Arvinder Singh Lovely of the Congress are all Punjabi, if Marlena’s contention is to be accepted. All the three are eyeing the Punjabi votes which is spread across all the 10 assembly segments.
 
Between Marlena and Lovely there is the contest for the Muslim votes too, which again has presence on almost all the segments and very dominant one in Okhla. Even at the height of Narendra Modi wave in 2014, in East Delhi the BJP candidate Mahesh Giri could not cross the 50 percent vote mark and scored less than the combined vote of the AAP and the Congress. At that time Congress was at its nadir and AAP in the best of health with a well-known face in Rajmohan Gandhi, grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, contesting on its broom symbol.
 
As mentioned earlier this time all the three candidates are wooing the Punjabi votes aggressively revisiting the strategies to woo the vote bank which had visually gone dormant following the rise of Sheila Dikshit and her brand of metropolitan politics in the national Capital.
 
There is no denying the fact that the influence of Punjabi voters, even during Dikshit regime, always remained. It was tactfully harvested largely by the Congress first through Har Kishan Lal Bhagat, who was a political colossus in his time, and later Team Dikhsit especially in East Delhi through leaders like Ashok Walia and Arvinder Singh Lovely among others. Whether the Congress manages to regain the lost turf or the Punjabis vote for a more famous face from their community in cricketer Gautam Gambhir or would they support the newly baptized Punjabi-Rajput in Atishit Marlena is something which should be of much interest to all.
 
(First published in News18.Com)
 

Contact us

  • Add: 1304 Satpura Appt.
    Kaushambi, Delhi NCR, INDIA
  • Tel: (+844) 456 789 101
You are here: Home